Home › Forums › Australian Financial Services Licensing (AFSL) Forum › Training and Compliance Policy
- This topic has 1 reply, 1 voice, and was last updated 12 years, 11 months ago by Archived User.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Archived UserMemberHi there,
The Group I represent is a ‘Holding’ company that wholly owns two ARs, who are the issuers.
I have attempted to buid the AFSL compliance framework from zero and I’m floudering a bit with regards to the above. I wish to include monitoring and supervision into this document as well as training and legal compliance matters. As a Group we only provide general advice, with regards to a non cash payment product, and I do not want to overburden managers with unneccessary compliance tasks. If anyone can suggest an acceptable level of training/supervision/monitoring with regards to Compliance for the purposes of AFSL it would be appreciated.
Archived UserMemberThe standard answer to your question is that your systems need to be scalable to the nature of your business. That said, ASIC has a bunch of expectations that effectively set a minimum benchmark. There are plenty of off the shelf compliance procedures kits that include a monitoring program and a compliance diary or equivalent (we have one, for example). However, when implementing the supervision and monitoring, that comes down to actual practice and can be difficult to do in a way that doesn’t stifle business – as you rightly point out. For example, call centres may require a script to be used and then compliance staff will monitor a percentage of calls and check them off against a compliance checklist. We have a client that only offers one product and gives some general advice but primarily gives no advice. We provide no-advice training to their staff approximately annually. There are also various “do’s and don’ts” checklist using traffic-light systems that are used in their office. Monitoring and supervision in their instance is fairly “light touch”, but is scaleable and appropriate to the amount of financial services provided. I would be interested to know how the two ARs (I assume you mean Authorised Representatives) are issuers. Is this via an Intermediary Authorisation? Using ARs as issuers throws up a few complex and interesting legal issues.
If you require further information, please feel free to contact our office.
Author: Paul Derham
-
AuthorPosts