Australian Financial Services Licensing (AFSL) Forum

Home Forums Australian Financial Services Licensing (AFSL) Forum Is a "licensee a company" or the director / RM

This topic contains 1 reply, has 2 voices, and was last updated by Grant Holley Grant Holley 3 years, 1 month ago.

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #5195 Reply

    licencefx
    Member

    Section 912A of the corps act outlines what a licensee must do. It says a licensee must: XYZ etc.

    Is the licensee the company that holds the AFSL, and/or the director and/or the responsible manager?

     

    #5216 Reply
    Grant Holley
    Grant Holley
    Member

    The licensee is the entity (e.g. the company) that holds the AFSL and is thus responsible for complying with the s912A requirements.

     

    ‘Responsible Manager’ (RM) is not defined in the relevant legislation, nor are there any statutory duties or obligations attached to the position.  The RMs are the people nominated by the Licensee to demonstrate its compliance with the 912A requirement to be competent.  The RM will be an employee or contractor to the Licence holder, and their obligations are set out in their employment or sub-contract.  Like other employees, they play a practical or functional role in carrying on and supervising the business of the Licensee.

     

    The 912A obligations are not placed on the directors personally, but on the Licensee company of which they are directors.  Directors have duties to act with due care and diligence and in the best interests of the company.  If they conduct the licenced business in a way that is clearly not in the company’s best interests, they could be breaching their director’s duties.  A recent example involved directors operating a financial advice business employing a business model that, the court found, was conflicted and not in the best interests of clients.  This lead to a loss of the AFSL.  Since the AFSL was necessary to the conduct of the business, and this was an outcome the board should have considered, the Court held that the directors had not exercised their duties with due care and skill, nor was in the best interests of the company.

     

    Author: Grant Holley (Partner)

    Co-contributor: Hugo Sasse (Law Clerk)

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

Reply

Reply To: Is a "licensee a company" or the director / RM

Your information:


<a href="" title="" rel="" target=""> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <pre> <em> <strong> <del datetime=""> <ul> <ol start=""> <li> <img src="" border="" alt="" height="" width="">

  • Free answers to common Financial Services Regulation (FSR), Consumer Credit and AML/CTF issues.

    Click here to join our LinkedIn group for responsible managers and compliance professionals.
    joinUsOnLinkedIn
  • Training

    Regulatory Compliance Training for Directors, Responsible Managers and Compliance Staff

    View Courses

  • Legal Advice

    Review your AFSL or ACL disclosure documents, conduct a licensee audit and more…

    Get Legal Advice

  • Compliance support

    The HN Hub – an online platform built to support Responsible Managers and Compliance Staff

    More