Australian Financial Services Licensing (AFSL) Forum

Home Forums Australian Financial Services Licensing (AFSL) Forum Basis for Recommendation involving a Financial Product

This topic contains 1 reply, has 2 voices, and was last updated by  Clare McAdam 8 years, 6 months ago.

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #3019 Reply

    Hi 


    If advice involves a strategy recommendation such as a class of product (eg an annuity, platform, wrap etc for our wealth creation strategy) and the advice also involves a specific financial product (eg ABC wrap) is the basis for the product covered within the strategy recommendation? Alternatively, do you need to relate both the strategy (or class of product) and the specific product back to the client’s relevant personal circumstances? 


    I’ve researched this issue but have been unable to find a definitive answer. Section 761A defines relevant personal circumstances as any matter relevant to the advice. RG175.421 describes what those circumstances generally involve in cases where the advice relates to a product ‘with an investment component’ (ie managed funds, shares, investment portfolio). 


    However, it is unclear what those circumstances would include for wraps, platforms, margin lending facilities or other administration services. Could it therefore be that a recommended strategy which meets a client’s circumstances would also provide the basis for the specific product or administration service recommended? 


    I’m interested to hear your views, experiences or if you could refer me to any material which covers this. 


    Regards

    James

    #3145 Reply

    Clare McAdam
    Member

    Hi James,

    In essence, the recommendation needs to currently meet the reasonable basis obligations in s945A. Our view is that this applies and relates to both the strategy and the product whether it be the platform/wrap or underlying assets/funds.

    Similarly, under best interests, the safe harbour steps require strategy recommendations (in RG 175,  ASIC is understandably very focused on strategy first and product second) and if reasonable investigation into financial products that might achieve the client: objectives and needs.

    Once again, we think this investigation would address the specific platform/wrap and specific underlying financial products.

    Contact us, if you want to seek legal advice

    Kind Regards,

    Author: Tim Nethercote

     

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

Reply

Reply To: Basis for Recommendation involving a Financial Product

Your information:


<a href="" title="" rel="" target=""> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <pre> <em> <strong> <del datetime=""> <ul> <ol start=""> <li> <img src="" border="" alt="" height="" width="">

  • Free answers to common Financial Services Regulation (FSR), Consumer Credit and AML/CTF issues.

    Click here to join our LinkedIn group for responsible managers and compliance professionals.
    joinUsOnLinkedIn
  • Training

    Regulatory Compliance Training for Directors, Responsible Managers and Compliance Staff

    View Courses

  • Legal Advice

    Review your AFSL or ACL disclosure documents, conduct a licensee audit and more…

    Get Legal Advice

  • Compliance support

    The HN Hub – an online platform built to support Responsible Managers and Compliance Staff

    More