Australian Financial Services Licensing (AFSL) Forum

Home Forums Australian Financial Services Licensing (AFSL) Forum ASIC positive net asset requirement for Limited AFSL application

  • This topic has 1 reply, 1 voice, and was last updated 4 weeks, 1 day ago by damienshanahan.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
  • #4727 Reply


    I am in the process of completing my application for a Limited AFSL with ASIC in the name of a newly created company.

    I set up a new company with a discretionary trust owning 100 ordinary shares in the company.

    What options are there to provide funds to the new company without a liability appearing on the balance sheet of the company? e.g. issue more shares in the new company etc.  (If it helps, I am applying for my Limited AFSL with ASIC and need to submit financials for the new company with ASIC. This new entity (the Company) must have positive net assets.)

    #4733 Reply

    Hi Damien,


    Thanks for your question.


    Issuing shares is one way to raise sufficient capital to meet ASIC’s financial resource requirements.  However, this is not the only way.


    ASIC’s Regulatory Guide 166 (RG 166) sets out the financial resource requirements for AFSL holders. Holders of a limited AFSL will need to meet the base level financial requirements which are made up of solvency and positive net assets requirement, the cash needs requirement and audit requirement – although a limited AFSL holder will not need to meet the audit requirement if they don’t hold client money and lodge an annual compliance certificate.


    In respect of the positive net assets requirement, total assets must exceed total liabilities and the AFSL holder must at all times have no reason to suspect that total assets would no longer exceed total liabilities on a current balance sheet. RG 166 does state that if you have more liabilities than assets, you can apply an alternative test. You can calculate on the basis of adjusted assets and/or adjusted liabilities. These are specifically defined in RG 166. For example, for the calculation of adjusted assets an undertaking from certain providers may be taken into account while for adjusted liabilities debt that has been subordinated may be excluded from the calculation of liabilities. You should take a close look at RG 166 and the definitions of adjusted assets and adjusted liabilities to determine whether they assist you to meet the positive net asset requirement.


    You can also consider using a deed of subordination – see RG 166.102-103.


    For further information please contact our Financial Services Team.


    Authors: Fiona McCord & Jesse Vermiglio


    Co-contributor: Carmelene Greco


Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)


Reply To: ASIC positive net asset requirement for Limited AFSL application

Your information:

<a href="" title="" rel="" target=""> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <pre class=""> <em> <strong> <del datetime="" cite=""> <ins datetime="" cite=""> <ul> <ol start=""> <li> <img src="" border="" alt="" height="" width="">

  • Free answers to common Financial Services Regulation (FSR), Consumer Credit and AML/CTF issues.

    Click here to join our LinkedIn group for responsible managers and compliance professionals.
  • Training

    Regulatory Compliance Training for Directors, Responsible Managers and Compliance Staff

    View Courses

  • Legal Advice

    Review your AFSL or ACL disclosure documents, conduct a licensee audit and more…

    Get Legal Advice

  • Compliance support

    The HN Hub – an online platform built to support Responsible Managers and Compliance Staff